Content Analysis in Critical and Emergency Care: A Discussion Paper
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1891/1748-6254.13.1.8Keywords:
content analysis, qualitative data, trustworthiness, critical care, conventional approachAbstract
Introduction: Content analysis, although firstly introduced in social sciences as a qualitative research method, has become a popular method for inquiry in healthcare sciences, including emergency and critical care nursing.
Aim: The aim of content analysis is to interpret qualitative data through coding and analytical identification of themes or schemas.
Results: There are different forms of content analysis, according to the aim of the study, (a) the conventional approach, (b) the direct approach, and (c) the summative approach. The depth of the analysis is defined by the degree to which the researcher reveals the covered meanings included in data. The range of the analysis is defined by the number of the identified themes and relevant categories of themes, and mainly of how abstract is the identified association among the different categories of themes. Balancing the strengths against the researcher-identified limitations and other weaknesses of the study, the researchers determine the value or trustworthiness of study findings, aiming to increase the transferability of the findings to other populations.
Conclusion: Qualitative research is under-used as a research method in emergency and critical care despite the limitless variations of clinical research questions that can be investigated through this method of inquiry and relevant study designs, including content analysis.
References
Aristidou, M., Vouzavali, F., Karanikola, M. N., Lambrinou, E., & Papathanassoglou, E. (2018). A meta-ethnography of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors' meanings on life and death. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 33(3), E10–E20. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000467
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2016, 8–14.
Charlesworth, M. A., & Foëx, B. (2016). Qualitative research in critical care: Has its time finally come?Journal of Intensive Care Society, 17(2), 146–153.
Cook, D. A., Kuper, A., Hatala, R., & Ginsburg, S. (2016). When assessment data are words: Validity evidence for qualitative educational assessments. Academic Medicine, 91(10), 1359–1369.
Coombs, M., Mitchell, M., James, S., & Wetzig, K. (2017). Intensive care bereavement practices across New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A qualitative content analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(19–20), 2944–2952.
Donaghy, E., Salisbury, L., Lone, N. I., Lee, R., Ramsey, P., Rattray, J. E., & Walsh, T. S. (2018). Unplanned early hospital readmission among critical care survivors: A mixed methods study of patients and carers. BMJ Quality and Safety, 27(11), 915–927.
Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Murphy, D. (2018). Therapist empathy and client outcome: An updated meta-analysis. Psychotherapy (Chic), 55(4), 399–410.
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7, 93–99.
Graneheim, H. U., Lindgrena, B., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educator Today, 56, 29–34.
Hekmatpou, D., & Ebrahimi-Fakhar, H. R. (2015). Addressing disruption in family life: Exploration of the perceived needs of the families of patients hospitalized in critical care units in Iran. Journal of Nursing Research, 23(2), 118–124.
Hoffmann, S., Dreher-Hummel, T., Dollinger, C., & Frei, I. A. (2018). Patient complaints as a means to improve quality of hospital care. Results of a qualitative content analysis. Pflege, 31(2), 101–109.
Hsieh, H., & Shannon, E. S. (2015). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Ingham-Broomfield, B. (2014). A nurses' guide to qualitative research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(3), 34–39.
Karanikola, M., Kaikoushi, K., Doulougeri, K., Koutrouba, A., & Papathanassoglou, E. (2018). Perceptions of professional role in community mental health nurses: The interplay of power relations between nurses and mentally ill individuals. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 32(5), 677–687.
Karanikola, M. N., & Papathanassoglou, E. D. (2015). Measuring professional satisfaction in Greek nurses: Combination of qualitative and quantitative investigation to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Index of Work Satisfaction. Applied Nursing Research, 28(1), 48–54.
Kilbourne, A., & Atkins, D. (2015). Evidence-based policy making: Balancing rigor with real-world health care for veterans and military personnel. N C Medical Journal, 76(5), 339–342.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
Morse, M. J. (2015). “Data were saturated…”. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 587–588.
Munhall, P. A. (2012). Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (5th ed.). Ontario: Jones & Barrlett Learning.
Sánchez-Vallejo, A., Fernández, D., Pérez-Gutiérrez, A., & Fernández-Fernández, M. (2016). Analysis of needs of the critically ill relatives and critical care professional's opinion. Intensiva, 40(9), 527–540. doi:10.1016/j.medin.2016.03.005
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Schram, A. W., Hougham, G. W., Meltzer, D. O., & Ruhnke, G. W. (2017). Palliative care in critical care settings: A systematic review of communication-based competencies essential for patient and family satisfaction. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 34(9), 887–895.
Stamps, L. P. (1997). Nurses and work satisfaction: An index for measurement. Chicago: Health Administration Press.
Tomasi, J., Warren, C., Kolodzey, L., Pinkney, S., Guerguerian, A. M., Kirsch, R., … Trbovich, P. (2018). Convergent parallel mixed-methods study to understand information exchange in paediatric critical care and inform the development of safety-enhancing interventions: A protocol study. BMJ Open, 8(8), e023691.
