Interrater Reliability of the COMHON Index To Assess Pressure Injury Risk In ICU

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/ijcc985

Keywords:

pressure injury, intensive care, prevalence

Abstract

Background: When using a pressure injury risk assessment tool, it is important to consider its interrater reliability (IRR), given that multiple raters may assess individual patients using the tool. For repeated measurements on a scale, intraclass correlation (ICC) is the most appropriate method to assess reliability (de Vet et al., 2006; Streiner & Kottner, 2014).

 Aim: To summarise studies that have investigated interrater reliability of the COMHON Index using ICC.

 Methods: Interrater reliability studies.

 Results: Three studies have investigated interrater reliability (Fulbrook & Anderson, 2016; Uslu et al., 2024; Lovegrove et al., 2024) using English, Turkish and Chinese versions of the COMHON Index (https://wfccn.org/comhon-index). In the first study, ICC (2,1) .90 (95% CI .83-.95) was reported, and the COMHON Index was found to be superior to the Braden, Norton and Waterlow tools. In the two recent studies, ICC (1,1) .996 (95% CI .993-.998) and ICC (1,1) .973 (95% CI .949-.988). In the latter study, the COMHON Index was found to be superior to the Braden Scale.

 Conclusions: The COMHON Index has demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability in three studies. Measurement error of the COMHON RAS is small, and therefore it is sufficiently sensitive to detect minimally important changes in score. Further research needed to test the predictive validity of the COMHON Index.

 References

de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006;59(10):1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015.

Fulbrook P, Anderson A. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016;72(3):680-692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12825.

Lovegrove J, Fulbrook P, Yuan C, Lin F, Liu X-L The COMHON Index and the Braden Scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: An interrater reliability and convergent validity study, 2024, unpublished.

Streiner DL, Kottner J. Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2014;70(9):1970–1979. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12402.

Uslu Y, Fulbrook P, Eren E, Lovegrove J, Cobos Vargas A, Colmenero M. Assessment of pressure injury risk in intensive care using the COMHON Index: an interrater reliability study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2024, (online ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103653.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Fulbrook, P. (2024). Interrater Reliability of the COMHON Index To Assess Pressure Injury Risk In ICU. International Journal of Critical Care, 18(4), 43–44. https://doi.org/10.29173/ijcc985

Issue

Section

Other (announcement, news item, advertisement, book review, etc.)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.